- #HOW DO I FIND QUICKEN FILES ON SEAGATE BACKUP ARCHIVE#
- #HOW DO I FIND QUICKEN FILES ON SEAGATE BACKUP PC#
- #HOW DO I FIND QUICKEN FILES ON SEAGATE BACKUP ZIP#
There is also a 5¢ per 1,000 requests “request” fee to Glacier, which the Arq website describes as “approximately $.05/ GB in ‘per-request’ fees”, so I think means that it’d cost $118.80 for the initial backup, although that’s not really clear to me. Just to do the math if I were to backup just my Aperture originals (masters), that’s currently 2.32 TB, or 2,376 GB. For the record, while I’ve never had the need to restore a massive Aperture library, I have created smaller test libraries, backed them up and restored them with no problem. No I didn’t open every single file (there were lots of them), but I opened several selected randomly, of different formats ( JPG, TIF, ORF) and all opened fine. That evening I kicked it off for an overnight download.
#HOW DO I FIND QUICKEN FILES ON SEAGATE BACKUP ZIP#
A short time later I received an email that my zip was ready to download, and when I realized I had 35 GB to pull, I downloaded the “Backblaze Downloader” app, which allows you to pause your backup mid-go. The process was simple I logged onto Backblaze, selected a couple of whole-month folders from my Aperture Masters collection, and clicked restore.
#HOW DO I FIND QUICKEN FILES ON SEAGATE BACKUP ARCHIVE#
I decided to run a small real-world test, and restore roughly 35 GB of backed up photos (about 1.5% of my 2.3 TB photo archive on Backblaze). Backblaze will continue to be my online backup service of choice. Remember, “if it doesn’t exist in three places, it doesn’t exist”. Nothing is perfect, and this is why we have multiple backups. It’s not fair to Backblaze or to their users to panic people into thinking that their backups may not be safe.ĭoes this mean Backblaze is infallible? No, of course not. The results are misleading, and frankly, dangerous. So using a clone-checker to check a non-clone backup isn’t an accurate test. What they are saying is that Backblaze was never designed to make a mirror or clone of your system, which is what Backup Bouncer looks for. Those are the most commonly used and viewed types of metadata, and what we focus on.” “To be clear, Backblaze specifically backs up the Macintosh resource forks, the Finder info of “type” and “creator”, and the created and modified dates of a file.
#HOW DO I FIND QUICKEN FILES ON SEAGATE BACKUP PC#
Backblaze also leans towards cross platform: you can backup a Mac and restore to a PC and vice versa. Backblaze is to keep real-world data files like pictures and movies and music and Quicken files safe-standard stuff that standard users deal with. Backblaze explicitly is for data and specifically refuses to backup system files and the more esoteric metadata, such as Finder comments, bootability flags, ACLs, etc. Backblaze is not a drive cloner, and we should not be used as such as you cannot boot from a Backblaze backup. “Backup Bouncer, for the most part, is a “file system cloner bouncer” and is not a great way of testing a backup service. So naturally, I asked Backblaze, and am quoting their response below. But the dates on the files might not be correct, for instance.” But regardless 19 out of 20 failures does not instill confidence. You’ll still be able to view your restored photos, edit your restored Office docs, play your restored music. Any of those backup apps can restore your file contents - photos, Office docs, music files. In complete fairness to Haystack Software, the folks who wrote this article, they did state “What do these results mean? For most scenarios, probably nothing. In fact, the list goes on to show that Carbonite failed 20 out of 20, Dropbox failed 19 of 20, and so-on. It states that Backblaze failed 19 out of 20 tests using a test suite called “Backup Bouncer”. The statement in question is under the header “Accuracy”, around the middle of the Arq info page. As you know I’m a huge supporter of Backblaze (having written a very popular post on the topic “Cloud Backup Backblaze in the Real World” last year), so seeing anything negative about a service I rely on is sure to get my hackles up! It’s about a disturbing statement I read on the Haystack website, which I immediately challenged Backblaze on.
Backup Bouncer TestĪnyway, this article isn’t about Arq or Glacier. Granted, you can buy a 3TB USB 3 hard drive today for just $130 and ship that to a friend on the other side of the country for safe keeping, but by now I think we all know the advantages of automated, offsite backup. There are initial upload and then retrieval charges to consider as well, but the peace of mind of online/cloud backup is hard to put a price on. Since Glacier is only $.01 per GB per month (about $10 per TB), it’s a pretty good deal. This is a $29 app that gives you a clean interface to Amazon’s S3 or Glacier servers, allowing you to use Amazon as a backup service. Recently I was introduced to a backup application called Arq, by Haystack Software.